Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz Chief Organizer Maryam Nawaz Sharif questioned Supreme Court of Pakistan Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial that was he happy to see sea of people in front of SCP.
She was referring to CJP remark towards Imran Khan during court hearing, ‘ Good to see you’.
She was addressing a PDM protest in front of Supreme Court of Pakistan on Monday.
She said Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial, facilitated former prime minister and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan.
She said that the SC labelled a former prime minister ‘Sicilian Mafia’ but it was rather pleased to meet another ex-PM who embezzled billions of rupees.
Terming the Parliament as ‘the mother of all institutions’, she said that the top court decided to contest against it by taking notice of a law which was yet to be enacted.
Maryam Nawaz said that the ‘doctrine of necessity’ was responsible for bringing down the country as the elected prime ministers were sent home by the SC.
She said that the Constitution was abrogated by military dictators but the top court never sent anyone of them home but instead endorsed illegitimate rules.
PML-N leader said that judicial martial law has been imposed in the country.
She asked if any doctrine of necessity was revived for the betterment of the country or for its people.
Criticising CJP, she said that the top jurist cites the example of Justice Robert Cornelius – the 4th Chief Justice of Pakistan – but follows the footsteps of Justice Munir – second Chief Justice of Pakistan.
The PML-N leader accused the people sitting inside the building of SC having ill-intentions.
She asserted that the crises brewing in the country primarily stem from the Supreme Court rather than Zaman Park.
She also accused CJP Bandial of rewriting the Constitution by claiming that Article 63-A was misinterpreted and the Punjab government was ‘served’ to Imran Khan in the plate despite knowing that the assembly would be dissolved.
The PML-N leader said that the top jurist abused his power and refused to accept the decision of 4-3 in election case
