Shehbaz Sharif and son Hamza Shehbaz indicted in Ramzan Sugar Mills case

According to the report of Baaghi TV, a hearing was held on the Ramzan Sugar Mills reference against Shahbaz Sharif and Hamza Shahbaz.

Accountability court judge Amjad Nazir is hearing the case. Opposition leader Shahbaz Sharif appeared before the court. The court said that if Hamza Shahbaz comes today, he will be charged. Advocate Amjad Pervez said that Shahbaz Sharif has appeared for the court record. Arguments are yet to be made regarding the crime.

Shahbaz Sharif said that I have to go to Islamabad. The court should allow me to go. The court said that today you have to be indicted. Your lawyer wants to discuss this. If your lawyer does not argue, you will be charged.

Shahbaz Sharif’s lawyers opposed the indictment in the Ramzan Sugar Mill reference, on which the court said that Shahbaz Sharif has already been indicted. Now there is a side reference in which the accused has to be charged.

Advocate Amjad Pervez said that Shahbaz Sharif was falsely accused of corruption and corrupt practices. On which the court said that this case is fixed for late indictment, no surprise, if you have to discuss for 10 hours, we will hear.

Hamza Shahbaz’s lawyer said, “Give us a chance. We want to give arguments on the indictment. The court said that they have given us a lot of opportunity to discuss today. We will write down all your legal rights in the verdict.”

Shahbaz Sharif and Hamza Shahbaz were indicted in the Ramzan Sugar Mills case. Shahbaz Sharif and Hamza Shahbaz pleaded not guilty. The accountability court summoned the witnesses for reference on August 27.

Strict security arrangements have been made for the appearance of Shahbaz Sharif and Hamza Shahbaz in the court, a heavy contingent of police has been deployed.

It should be noted that in the Ramzan Sugar Mills case, NAB has arrested Hamza Shahbaz. Hamza Shahbaz is handed over to NAB on physical remand. NAB had arrested Hamza Shahbaz after his bail application was rejected by the Lahore High Court.