Written by Muhammad Nadeem Bhatti.
When we look at the journey of Pakistani media, it is not merely limited to the increase in television channels or the glittering screens; rather, it represents an evolutionary process built upon ideological struggles, state and political pressures, economic challenges, and the battle for the survival of professional principles.
In such an atmosphere, those journalists and anchors hold greater importance who do not limit themselves to conventional television routines but, through their character, thought process, research, quality of questioning, and public influence, establish a distinct identity. The name of Mubasher Lucman falls within this category, where although the personality may be considered relatively controversial, his professional influence remains clear, objective, and undeniable. In this context, his nomination for the Lifetime Achievement Award is both symbolic and meaningful, as its impact will not remain confined to personal recognition alone but will also be regarded as a reference point for courage within media values.
A Heartbreaking Salute: Indian Wing Commander Afshan’s Tribute to Her Fallen Husband
Pakistan strongly condemns Israeli attacks across Gaza
Pakistan’s first-ever int’l Qirat competition begins on Monday
For more such Opinions & Blogs, click here.
In Pakistan, journalism has always been a central point of power, pressure, significance, conspiracy, and the clash between restriction and freedom. Here, those journalists are considered successful who master polite dialogue, strategic communication, balanced language, and institutional harmony. Yet, some journalists deviate from this traditional line and, through tough questioning and targeted investigation, put themselves against the status quo. Mubasher Lucman represents this style of journalism, as he prioritized his identity over media positioning. This approach earned him professional reputation, influence, and recognition, but simultaneously exposed him to criticism, controversy, and resistance. This comparative perspective distinguishes him from conventional anchors.
In Pakistan, investigative journalism often appears without political consequences and largely as a source of momentary sensationalism. However, Mubasher Lucman, through his broadcast strategy, gave central importance to research, continuity of facts, fact-based reporting, and questioning the performance of state institutions. His objective was not merely to convey news but to direct the outcomes of his queries towards policymakers, institutions, and power centers. This very approach makes him both objectionable and notable.
It is also worth mentioning that he understood the importance of digital journalism in Pakistan much earlier. At a time when most journalists focused exclusively on television ratings, Mubasher Lucman began providing realistic content to viewers. This approach transformed him from just a television anchor into a digital media policy influencer. This shift presents the direction of future media, where controlled editorial boards will be replaced by direct public-response mechanisms.
Pakistan, EU vow stronger economic ties through GSP+
Death anniversary of Chocolate Hero Waheed Murad today
Pakistan strengthens digital connectivity with deployment of new submarine cable system
A journalist’s life does not become complex merely by speaking the truth or showing reality; the real complexity lies in how the consequences unfold after the truth is broadcast. Whenever Mubasher Lucman raised questions, he was aware that the outcomes would not remain confined to public debates alone but would also reach power structures. This professional awareness makes him significant even within ideological journalism.
In my view, his style is more direct, sharp, and straightforward, which sometimes gives the impression that perception dominates reality. However, the real debate is based on the foundation and evidence of the question. Internationally, it is necessary to understand the difference between trial-based journalism and investigative journalism. In Pakistan, the media rating system still prioritizes highly dramatic content, while Mubasher Lucman’s power-politics inquiry model stands distinct.
In global journalistic history, there is no shortage of personalities who turned the heat of questioning into professional excellence. American journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein introduced a new dimension to investigative journalism through the Watergate scandal and questioned the contradictions of power and human rights in the Middle East. Julian Assange and Edward Snowden exposed concealed data and intelligence policies within multinational systems. David Frost proved through the Nixon interviews that accountability can also be achieved through intelligent dialogue. These examples show that investigative journalism is not the tradition of a single country but part of a global intellectual movement. In this context, Mubasher Lucman’s journalistic model differs from traditional Pakistani media, where the courage of questioning and the societal cost of answers stand on the same plane.
After doctors, now journalists face Hindutva onslaught
India has activated stooges to defame Pakistan, freedom movement: APHC
Tensions escalate in Himachal as Hindu groups target mosques
When Pakistani media was centred only around television rating systems, Mubasher Lucman recognized digital media as the decisive ground for the future. His model of direct digital public media aligns with international platforms such as VICE, AJ+, BBC Trending, and Vox. In this model, the journalist is connected not with rating desks but with direct public response — a concept internationally known as response journalism. Such a model turns the journalist into a media architect, not merely a news conveyor, and this transformation is evident in Mubasher Lucman’s timeline.
History reveals that power never welcomes questions, regardless of the region. American journalists faced courts over Pentagon leaks, British reporters confronted secrecy laws, Arab journalists paid with their lives for advocating human rights, European reporters endured corporate lobbying, while Pakistani journalists navigated policy pressures and proxy narratives. This global reality is also reflected in Mubasher Lucman’s journalistic path, where the weight of the question remains heavier than the price of the answer.
The future of Pakistani media does not lie in spontaneous camera shots or glittering words but in layered research, logical questioning, fact-based reporting, and digital interactive journalism. Those who connect content with observational truth will secure their place within future global media models.
Opinions regarding Mubasher Lucman’s nomination may differ, but it is undeniable that he turned questioning, digital direction, and investigative dynamics into a historical case study in Pakistani journalism. Recognition is not always applause; it is time and impact — and that is the true Lifetime Achievement.
For more such Opinions & Blogs, click here.
GCU Lahore celebrates World Television Day
The Rakkhi Bahini: A Force That Changed Bangladesh’s Destiny
Farhan Saeed Praises Talha Anjum’s Indian Flag – Social Media Loses It
Deadly Tejas Accident Exposes Long-Standing Crises in India’s Defence Aviation
Trump meets Zohran Mamdani at White House, offers warm praise
Written by Muhammad Nadeem Bhatti.
Stay tuned to Baaghi TV for more. Download our app for the latest news, updates & interesting content!
