Violent Extremism

Rampant religious extremism and sectarianism are wracking Pakistan today. The religiously frenzied features of Pakistani culture, politics and society are remnants of the long and dark shadow of General Zia- ul- Haq’s eleven years of Islamist rule that structured the entire state as a theater of religion. Zia’s regime was a setback for a faltering democratic process and ushered in an era of religious obscurantism that affected every facet of domestic and foreign policy. He saw Islam as a part of revolutionary process to overhaul Pakistan. But in the last four decades, there has been a complete erosion of the moral values of our society.

History bears testimony to the fact that the military complex and political leadership are the responsible factors in promoting and strengthening the hegemony and influence of religious extremist bigots. The former supports so called mullahs for a jihadist cause, strengthening the military narrative at the national level and to counter the political and nationalist narratives in the state and the latter have always exploited the religious card to legitimized authority, secure votes and counter opposition. The current imperium of TLP bigots and compunctious behavior of the government towards extremist clerics are the consequences of the state’s mullah centric policies.

The current unrest is erupted across major cities in Pakistan on Monday after TLP Chief Saad Hussain Rizvi was detained by security forces in Lahore as a “pre-emptive measure” ahead of the party’s April 20 deadline to the government as PTI government had promised TLP last November that they would take up the matter of the French ambassador’s expulsion from Pakistan with parliament in protest against the publication of blasphemous images in that country. The siege of various cities of the country by mobilized religious bigots has once again challenged the writ of the state. The entire state seems powerless against extremist mobs who have openly challenged the state’s writ. This manifestly represents the strength and influence of religious fundamentalists in Pakistan. The way the administration has collapsed in the face of mob violence is alarming and put the responsibility of forces in question. It also underscores the state’s ability to deal with rising religious extremism.

Religious organizations in Pakistan have a significant influence over particular segments of society, which they can mobilize for their objectives. They draw their strength from their connection to a sizeable segment of the society through which they exert pressure on the state to adopt extremist policies. The role of religious organizations in making Pakistan an Islamic state is well known; their subsequent success in pressurizing Z.A. Bhutto to declare Ahmedis as non- Muslims and include clauses in 1973 constitution to enforce sharia law is well known. Later, in 1983, General Zia accepted their demand of passing Hadood Ordinance, which restricts women’s rights. The growing influence and importance of Islamists helped ambitious and bigoted politicians to benefit from the powerful card of religion. The result is state divided on ethnic, cultural, linguist, sectarian and provincial lines. The state’s appeasement policy and pandering to the demands by reactionary forces has emboldened them and made them confident of their power to bring the country to halt.

Extremism is the biggest enemy of the nation, which is not only weakening the already deteriorating governance system in the country but also undermining national dignity and Pakistan’s global image. Given the current religious insecurity, Pakistan has to redesign its narrative and soft policies towards the religious bigots and extremists in order to stabilize the state. It is incumbent upon the state to ensure the supremacy of the constitution and rule of law, which is effective way to hold state writ. The state institutions should not avoid going against the bigots who are able to sabotage the peace and stability.


Stay tuned to Baaghi TV for more. Download our app for the latest news, updates & interesting content!

1 Comment
  1. At the same time, there is another side of the formation and organization of the utterance.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.