The write-up has been submitted by Iqbal Latif
This essay is a strategic and moral indictment of India’s increasingly reckless nuclear posture, particularly the disturbing normalisation of “acceptable city losses” as advocated by voices like Bharat Karnad.
It argues that such logic is not deterrence—it is institutionalised psychopathy masquerading as strategy.
Met Department predicts severe heatwave on Eid-ul-Adha
Trump likely to dump his red Tesla after ‘break up’ with Elon Musk
For more such Opinions & Blogs, click here.
The thesis is framed around the failure of India’s 2025 Operation Sindoor, which sought to punish Pakistan through conventional air dominance. Instead, India encountered an unprecedented fusion of Sino-Pakistani fifth-generation electronic warfare, leading to airspace denial, strategic paralysis, and narrative collapse.
Core Arguments:
1. The China–Pakistan Alliance is Doctrinal, Not Transactional
Pakistan is no longer a client state—it is China’s combat testbed, fully integrated into Beijing’s Western Theatre Command vision. Through shared platforms, ISR, and AI coordination, Pakistan serves both as a shield and as a live laboratory for China’s future war systems.
2. India’s Fragmented Military is No Match for Sino-Pak Integration
Despite billions spent on Rafales, S-400s, and Israeli jammers, India’s systems remain unintegrated and operationally incoherent. Operation Sindoor exposed this: Indian aircraft were locked, jammed, and denied strike capability without a single Pakistani escalation.
3. The “Obliterate Pakistan” Mentality is Based on Manufactured Consent
Using the media as a tool, Indian opinion-makers have deflected internal failures in Kashmir by blaming Pakistan. The essay dissects this propaganda using the case of recent attacks by Indian nationals—where Trump himself refused Indian escalation due to a lack of evidence implicating Pakistan.
4. Pakistan Has Absorbed Decades of Terror—India Cannot Handle One Attack
Pakistan faces 10–20 terror incidents daily, has lost over 70,000 lives, and yet refrains from calling for Indian city obliteration. In contrast, India’s response to a single internal failure is nuclear vengeance.
5. A Regional Nuclear War is Unwinnable and Civilizationally Fatal
There is no “limited” nuclear exchange. Once started, escalation is uncontrollable. Radioactive skies, poisoned rivers, and annihilated cities are the only outcomes. Even Cold War superpowers avoided this logic. India flirts with it now—openly.
Bangladesh general elections to be held in April 2026
After Trump call, Moscow backs his claims of Indo-Pakistan conflict mediation
Call to Action:
The thesis closes by advocating for a return to strategic sanity:
Reviving the Lahore Declaration
Establishing confidence-building measures
Replacing war rhetoric with regional technological collaboration
Transforming CPEC from a missile corridor into an energy corridor
Introduction: The Illusion of Strategic Dominance
India’s political and strategic elite believed they could reset the balance of South Asia by breaking Pakistan’s will—militarily, diplomatically, and psychologically. They believed Pakistan was a client state, a dispensable entity, and most dangerously, a state that could be “obliterated” without consequence.
They failed to understand a fundamental truth: China does not see Pakistan as expendable. It sees it as an extension of its western flank—vital to its Two-Ocean Doctrine. Just as the South China Sea anchors China’s eastern projection, Gwadar anchors the pivot of the west. This is not a transactional partnership. It is a deep-rooted, land-contiguous strategic convergence—from Kashgar to Pasni, from K2 to Karachi. The China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is not only economic—it is a forward-operational military artery.
India’s Obsession with Pakistan’s “Obliteration”
The sheer recklessness of Indian nuclear doctrine—now being publicly floated by its nuclear thinkers—is stunning. Men like Bharat Karnad speak casually of “losing a few cities” to annihilate Pakistan. That is not strategy—it is madness.
Let us be clear: no doctrine that sacrifices Mumbai or Delhi for a military illusion is credible. This is not chess. These are real cities, with real people, real economies, and real history. This isn’t Hiroshima. This is Chernobyl magnified—with modern warheads up to 100 times more powerful.
And what is it all for?
A Kashmir valley under siege on Eid?
A locked mosque in Srinagar?
A war that cannot be won, waged by a state too poor to afford its consequences?
India’s fantasy of wiping Pakistan from the map ignores the aftermath: a fractured region filled with nuclear fallout, fundamentalist chaos, and perpetual instability. A Pakistan in ashes would still burn Delhi and Bombay every day through insurgents and refugees. Obliteration is not an endgame—it is an invitation to perpetual disaster.
Trump snubs Musk after feud, says won’t speak to him as he lost his mind
PM along with delegation performs Umrah, expresses gratitude on victory of “Bunyan-um- Marsoos”
Strategic Contiguity: The Kashgar–Pasni Axis
India overlooks what it cannot undo: the geographical glue binding China and Pakistan. From Kashgar, through the Khunjerab Pass, down the Karakoram Highway, all the way to Gwadar, lies a land bridge more strategically valuable than any aircraft carrier.
This is the K2–Pasni corridor, and it gives China:
Access to warm waters,
Strategic depth against the Indo-Pacific alliance,
And a battle-tested partner on India’s western front.
No amount of rhetoric can sever that geography. It is a 24-hour highway of strategy, now humming with joint command, shared ISR, and Chinese satellite coverage.
Operation Sindoor: A Doctrinal Collapse
In May 2025, India launched Operation Sindoor—a limited, high-visibility air incursion intended to reassert dominance over Pakistan and shift the psychological balance. Instead, it ran headlong into the most integrated Sino-Pak warfighting theatre ever deployed in South Asia.
Indian jets were denied the skies.
PL-15 missiles, guided by Xinjiang ISR, targeted Indian logistics.
Pakistani JF-17s, powered by Chinese radars and AI pods, operated as autonomous strike platforms.
Indian S-400s and Rafales were muted by coordinated jamming.
What Delhi expected to be a fireworks show turned into a silence of strategic paralysis.
The Aerial Shock: How India Misread the Fifth-Generation Battlefield
India’s biggest miscalculation wasn’t Pakistan’s preparedness—it was China’s ambition.
China is industrialising its future warfare through Pakistan, offering fifth-generation stealth, EW, and AI-enabled systems at half price, on credit. Pakistan is now China’s live showroom for a $5 trillion aerial combat industry.
The world just witnessed the largest fifth-generation aerial confrontation—not over Taiwan, but above the Himalayas.
111 aircraft were scrambled.
72 of them were Indian.
Not a single Indian sortie broke through Pakistan’s defence dome.
Open-source analysts and defence insiders reported Indian strike aircraft unable to release weapons due to real-time EW jamming. Pakistani AI pods jammed signals. Chinese ISR fed targeting updates live. Stealth drones created phantom corridors. Indian command chains collapsed mid-air.
Twelve Indian aircraft were locked. Pakistani pilots held fire under orders: engage only if fired upon.
India believed it was facing flying coffins. Instead, it collided with a hybrid sky of discipline, doctrine, and data.
Kashmir must be included in Pakistan-India talks: Bilawal
England-India Test series to be named after Anderson, Tendulkar
Pakistan Is Now Ahead in the Stealth Game
While India begs for F-35s and tries to integrate Rafales into an incoherent mesh of Russian and Israeli systems, Pakistan has quietly entered stealth maturity.
Low-RCS aircraft.
AI-assisted targeting pods.
Field-proven EW swarms.
Mandarin-coded defence networks.
Pakistan’s edge is not in flashy procurement—but in systems that speak the same language.
Its pilots are not parade soldiers. They are war-hardened, with 22 years of experience in Waziristan, Swat, and counterinsurgency against Uzbek, Chechen, Taliban, and al-Qaeda fighters. India’s forces, by contrast, have been shielded from such attrition-driven evolution.
The Real Alliance: Not Symbolic—Systemic
This is no longer a buyer-seller relationship. It’s joint R&D, doctrinal fusion, and combat rehearsal.
China learns through Pakistan.
Pakistan sharpens through China.
India, trapped in siloed procurement, lacks integration.
While Delhi buys Rafales, Israeli jammers, and S-400s, these systems remain digitally disjointed. Pakistan’s Chinese-integrated command structure, by contrast, is synchronised across missiles, comms, and ISR.
The Nuclear Mirage: India’s Self-Destructive Gambit
India claims proximity makes Pakistan vulnerable. But this delusion cuts both ways. If Lahore is within reach, so is Amritsar. If Islamabad is exposed, so is Delhi.
There is no such thing as a limited nuclear exchange. Once triggered, escalation is uncontrollable:
Radioactive fallout will render glaciers poisonous.
Winds will scatter contamination across borders.
Cities will not burn—they will vanish.
This isn’t deterrence. This is institutionalised psychopathy, cloaked in doctrine. Even Cold War adversaries built fail-safes. India now flirts with fantasies of survivable nuclear sacrifice.
Beyond the Iron Fist: A Plea for Peace in a World Scarred by War
PM leaves for KSA on two-day official visit
The Manufactured Mandate: Parroting Terror to Justify Obliteration
Indian media has been weaponised to manufacture consent for escalation. Shoma Chaudhury and others repeatedly echo “terror attack” narratives—while ignoring the facts:
The four attackers were Indian nationals, Kashmiri Muslims.
The 118 homes destroyed were in Indian-administered Kashmir.
The 2,800 people arrested were Indian citizens—not Pakistani infiltrators.
This was an internal failure. A failure of 550,000 troops stationed in the most militarised zone on Earth. Worse, 20,000 tourists were left unguarded in a high-risk area. That is the real scandal.
When Modi sought carte blanche from Donald Trump to strike Pakistan, Trump asked for proof. U.S. intelligence indicated the attackers were not Pakistani. Modi refused to share evidence. That refusal still haunts India’s push for “parity.”
Meanwhile, RAW funds terror in Balochistan. It backs the TTP, one of the most vicious militant groups attacking Pakistani civilians and soldiers. It strategises openly about breaking West Punjab.
Yet Pakistan, despite losing over 70,000 people, does not threaten Mumbai or Delhi in retaliation. It absorbs 10 to 20 attacks daily. It doesn’t scream “obliterate.” It endures.
Pakistan was not neutral in the Afghan war. It was the buffer. It bore the burden. It blocked the gates of the subcontinent from foreign invasions. And it still pays for it.
Let us talk. Let us settle. Let us stop pretending that cities are poker chips.
The Narrative India Lost
India didn’t just lose the skies. It lost its narrative.
The world saw:
A government pushing nuclear rhetoric over a localised attack.
A media class feeding war fever.
A military that couldn’t defend tourists, let alone a doctrine.
A nation demanding annihilation instead of answers.
When the likes of Shoma Chaudhury chant “terror attack” without nuance, they cease to be journalists. They become amplifiers of annihilation.
China’s Strategic Jackpot
China didn’t need to fight. It observed:
Its missile systems are validated.
Its ISR matrix is tested.
Its doctrine is embedded throughout Pakistan.
Taiwan, the Philippines, and the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command must now reassess assumptions. Pakistan was the warm-up. Taiwan may be the showcase.
World Environment Day observed
Pakistan strongly condemns storming of Al-Aqsa Mosque
The Moral of Sindoor: Stop Pretending War Is a Trade-Off
There is no strategic calculus where 5 million deaths are “acceptable.”
You do not bargain with radioactive fallout.
You do not negotiate over poisoned rivers.
You do not recover from genocide by thermonuclear fire.
Even the Soviets and Americans feared this line. Why does India now walk it so casually?
The Case for Peace: South Asia’s Golden Alternative
Imagine a future where the CPEC corridor carries energy into Rajasthan instead of missiles across it.
Imagine:
A negotiated Kashmir peace.
Confidence-building measures.
Joint innovation across AI, biotech, and energy.
South Asia rising—not through war—but through wisdom.
Instead, India escalates. Pakistan integrates. And China calibrates.
Let us be clear:
Pakistan didn’t just survive Sindoor. It mastered it.
China didn’t just arm Pakistan. It armed itself.
India didn’t lose a war. It lost a doctrine.
PM takes strict notice of polio case in Diamer district
Around 1.5 million pilgrims perform Waqoof-e-Arafah
Final Word
India tried to break Pakistan’s will.
Instead, it unveiled its doctrinal delusion.
Pakistan didn’t scream.
It synchronised.
China didn’t threaten.
It integrated.
And India didn’t dominate.
It detonated its illusion of supremacy.
Operation Sindoor wasn’t a war.
It was a strategic unveiling.
A doctrinal collapse.
And a warning to the entire region:
“Those who gamble with cities… lose civilisations.”
For more such Opinions & Blogs, click here.
Love Guru poised to lead a new era for Pakistani films this Eid
Case Filed Agains Royal Challengers Bengaluru Over Stampede Deaths
Trump, Xi hold talks amid strained US-China ties over trade disputes
The write-up has been submitted by Iqbal Latif
Stay tuned to Baaghi TV for more. Download our app for the latest news, updates & interesting content!