Park Lane Property Repossessed Following High Court Enforcement

Key Developments:

• Park Lane property reportedly repossessed on October 21
• Equivo Limited identified as the enforcement company
• Previous allegations against Sajid Bashir resurface

A property on Park Lane, near Marble Arch in London, was reportedly taken back by its landlord on October 21, 2026, following enforcement action under an order of the High Court. The reported action was linked to years of unpaid rent.

Equivo Limited was identified as the company involved in the enforcement process. The UK-based firm specialises in debt collection, commercial recovery and High Court enforcement.

The reported repossession raises questions about the circumstances surrounding the tenancy, the outstanding rental obligations and the parties connected with the property. The precise details of the court order, the amount of rent allegedly unpaid and the identity of the tenant or company against which the order was issued require documentary confirmation.

Separately, information provided about Copperstones Limited refers to two historic County Court Judgments (CCJs) registered over the past six years, with a combined reported value of £8,420. These claims should be checked against official court and company records. A CCJ against a limited company is a judgment against that legal entity and does not, by itself, establish personal liability or wrongdoing by its directors or associates.

Previous allegations raised by Mubasher Lucman

Sajid Bashir has also previously been the subject of allegations raised by television journalist Mubasher Lucman. According to the claims cited in connection with Lucman's television coverage, Bashir was accused of defrauding several businessmen. The allegations reportedly portrayed him as someone who had built a reputation through questionable business dealings and had allegedly deceived people who had dealings with him.

Further allegations attributed to Lucman's reporting concerned claims that Bashir had, over a number of years, been involved in facilitating money laundering for corrupt politicians and members of their families. These claims, if substantiated, would raise serious questions about the nature of his business activities and the individuals allegedly connected to them.

The previous television coverage is relevant background to the allegations now being raised. However, the original broadcasts, supporting documentation and any subsequent legal proceedings should be examined before these claims are treated as established facts. Allegations of fraud and money laundering require evidence and should not be confused with proven convictions or judicial findings.

The reported property repossession, the corporate record claims and the allegations previously raised by Mubasher Lucman remain distinct matters unless documentary evidence establishes a direct connection between them. Sajid Bashir should be given an opportunity to respond to the allegations and clarify his position.

Stay tuned to Baaghi TV for more. Download our app for the latest news, updates & uncensored content!